The topic of this
month is Favorite
Trope (a favorite theme - amnesia? secret baby? fairy tale? friends-to-lovers?
etc.)
Published: Nov-2013
Genre: Historical / Victorian
My Rating: 4 stars
Part of a series: The London Trilogy #1
Sherry Thomas at her
best
In June we have to look for a novel with a
favourite trope. I have several of them: beta
heroes, friends to lovers, best enemies, second chance at love, amnesia,
disguise....
In my database, I’ve got this book as one of
those with the topics Best Enemies
and Love & Friendship between Hero
and Heroine, which is something quite surprising, because it looks like
they have to be either friends or foes. How can they be two things at the same time?
The Luckiest Lady in
London was in my
kindle because Sherry Thomas is one of my favourite authors and I’m trying to
read all her backlist. But at the same time, her style is so detailed, so
subtle in the words and gestures of the characters that I can only enjoy them
if I’m ready to read slowly. That’s the way to discover each little detail.
And one is not always the same kind of reader.
Sometimes you want fast reading, but
there are moments when you are ready for a slow
reading. So it was waiting for me to
have the good mood and now that moment has arrived.
The hero is Felix Rivendale, the marquess of
Wrenworth. It’s known as The Ideal Gentleman, because everybody has a good
opinion of him. Men and women respect him. He is noble, rich and of course, with
amazing good looks. Still a bachelor, he thinks he will marry someday in the
future, but he’s in no hurry. In a sense, he is a cheater, because he feels
inside that he does not deserve that adoration. Or, at least, he doesn’t trust
anyone as being sincere. Neither his mother nor his father loved him very
dearly, so he understands that love is something stupid to feel. A useless
feeling. Something that can only give you endless disappointment and pain.
Louisa Cantwell is young, but quite average.
Not particularly beautiful, or charming or accomplished in any of those things
(painting, music, embroidery) young women of good family were considered to
cultivate. She comes from a good but impoverished family, so she has to marry
well in order to support her sisters. She has thought for years about how to
achieve this, so when she goes to London for her first –and probably only-
Season, she knows she has to be charming and perfect –that’s the only way to
get a husband.
She gets quite a number of beaus, but not any
proposal yet when Lord Wrenworth sets his eyes on her. She knows that he is not
a man for her, in the sense that he will not ask for her hand. So although she
feels this powerful attraction towards him, she tries to ignore it.
But precisely that’s something that attracts
Lord Wrentworth. She wants him in a very physical way, he, and not his golden
image, and at the same time she rejects those desires. She is the only one who
seems to see him as he is. She does not flatter him, because she is not looking
for his good opinion.
Felix is so intensely attracted to her that
wants her to be his mistress, with a lot of money in order to support her
family. Louisa says ‘no’. If no noble gentleman wants her as a wife, then she
will start looking for butchers or lawyers or any other commoner that can give
her respectability and money, even if it sets her out of the ton.
Because now it’s not only a matter of physical
desire and economical security. She has fallen stupidly in love with him.
She was a woman in love and she wanted nothing less than his unscrupulous and very possibly unprincipled heart, proferred to her in slavish devotion.
At the end of the season, thanks to some
obscure ploys on Wrentworth part, nobody proposes to Louisa. So when Wrentworth
asks her to be his wife, as she didn’t want to be his mistress, she accepts,
even if she does not trust him.
Everybody considers then Louisa is the luckiest
lady in London. She is not a great beauty and hasn’t got an important dowry.
And nevertheless, she conquered one of the most attractive bachelors of the
ton. But Louisa is not so happy, and quite unsure of her luck. She distrusts
him.
The rest of the book is how they, slowly,
discover their feelings, accept them and acknowledges them.
This is a character-driven story, not a
plot-driven one. It’s delightful to see the feelings of the characters
developing and how both of them are frank -only to a certain point, because each
one of them distrust everything the other does.
There are some moments in which they sound like
friends, particularly at the beginning of the story, when she tries so
desperately to catch a husband and he tells her or does things that could help
her –or not. But there’s humour in their dialogues, which made me smile now and
then. Sometimes, it’s so subtle that I had to think for a moment if they were
saying what I thought they were saying.
There’s some hostility between them, too. And
distrust. A lot of it. And insincerity. But I wouldn’t consider them as enemies
in the strict sense of the word. So I wouldn’t put this book exactly in those
topics that attract me.
But it doesn’t matter as it is so beautifully
written. There quite a few intense emotional moments and the sensual scenes
were perfect, the kind of add to the story not only in the steamy way but they
also have got a sense in the plot. She is quite honest in her desires, he is a
little more reserved, on the one hand he wanted her as his mistress, but on the
other hand, there are moments when he does not want to reveal himself as he is
and therefore tries to resist the temptation Louisa represents.
I ‘only’ give it 4 stars because I grade a book
comparing it with other books of the same author. The master piece of Sherry
Thomas, for me, is Not Quite a Husband.
It had everything I love in a romance novel and left me with an intense
hangover. This Luckiest Lady goes
more in the line of My Beautiful Enemy, Delicious,
Ravishing the Heiress... Or His at
Night and Private Arrangements, which
are the other two books in this London Trilogy.
So another book from Sherry Thomas backlist
that goes out. There are so few that I haven’t still read that makes me sad, as
I’m not sure if she'll ever write this kind of book again.
Well, we are now in the middle of the TBR Challenge
2017 and I consider myself quite lucky,
as Louisa. This year it looks like I’m choosing better books for this
challenge, as I’m enjoying them a lot. I hope the second part of the year will
bring me beautiful books as this one.
I have this book in my TBR as well... I liked Delicious by the author and Ravishig the Heiress too (very angsty) but Private Arrangments I didn't like.
ResponderEliminarWhy did you mean with "she'll ever write this kind of book again"?
Happy reading!
I think that she is trying different things lately -a NA, a YA trilogy, and now those two books with Charlotte Sherlock. I have not read any of them yet but they don't look like historical romances, do they?
EliminarHello! Sorry it took me so long to come and reply!
EliminarYes, i can see that. I'm not a big fan of NA...I read those but more often than not I end up disappointed and thinking it's just another way to say YA... I guess I see why readers would miss her "usual" historicals...
Oh I need to re-read this one! Thank you for the reminder, Bona! ::waving::
ResponderEliminarWell, glad to be of service.
Eliminar